Back to Top page
Back to previous page

2000-12-13 US Supreme Court Decision on Presidential Election

I have a chance to read Federal Supreme Court decision on CNN.　This world is really convenient to see the verdict almost on line. My personal impression is that the verdict is most reasonable one , taking into account the whole current situation politically and socially.
But dissenting opinion of judges are more interesting for me, and from the pure legal point of view,  "The most important thing we do is not doing" would be right answer.

<Excerpt>
SUPREME COURT OF UNITED STATES (Dec.12, 2000)；George W Bush, et al., Petitioners v. Albert Gore, Jr.,et al.
Per Curiam; (through the court)
I; With respect to the equal protection question, we find a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
II.A;II.B;
Because it is evident that any recount seeking to meet the December 12 date will be unconstitutional for the reasons we have discussed, we reverse the judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida ordering a recount to proceed.
Seven Justices of the Court agree that there are constitutional problems with the recount ordered by the Florida Supreme Court that demand a remedy. See post, at 6 (SOUTER, J., dissenting); post, at 2, 15 (BREYER, J., dissenting).
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. It is so ordered.

<Remark>
The percentage of nonvotes in this election in counties using a punch-card system was 3.92%; In contrast, the rate of error under the more modern optical-scan systems was only 1.43%.

Justice Breyer, dissenting
The majority raised three Equal Protection problems with Florida Supreme Court's recount order; first, the failure to include overvotes in the manual recount; second, the fact that all ballots, rather than simply the undervotes, were recounted in some, but not all, counties; and third, the absence of a uniform, specific standard to guide the recounts.
"The most important thing we do is not doing". What it does repair the damage done as best we now can, by permitting the Florida recount to continue under uniform standards. I respectfully dissent.